How to Make Better Decisions Using the Yes No Button

Written by Kapil Yadav
Illustration for How to Make Better Decisions Using the Yes No Button

Making decisions is hard, even the small ones. Standing in front of the fridge deciding what to eat, staring at two nearly identical job offers, or rereading the same text message for the tenth time before hitting send: these moments all draw on the same limited mental resource. Researchers call the drop in decision quality that follows a long stretch of choosing “decision fatigue,” and it explains why the last decision of a long day so often feels harder than the first. The Yes No Button offers a deliberately low-tech fix for the small end of that problem: use randomness to break through indecision instead of grinding through it.

Why a Coin Flip Actually Works

It sounds counterintuitive to hand a real decision over to a 50/50 random result, but there is genuine research behind the idea. University of Chicago economist Steven Levitt ran a large-scale study in which more than 20,000 people facing a difficult decision, from quitting a job to ending a relationship, flipped a virtual coin and were asked to follow it. People whose coin came up heads were meaningfully more likely to actually make the change than those who got tails, and the people who made a change reported being happier six months later, regardless of which way the coin had landed. Levitt’s conclusion, published as an NBER working paper titled “Heads or Tails: The Impact of a Coin Toss on Major Life Decisions and Subsequent Happiness”, was that most people are more cautious about making a change than is actually good for them. A coin, or a button, is a way of acting on that nudge.

The Yes No Button is not claiming to be a research instrument, and it should not carry the weight of major life decisions on its own. But the same underlying mechanism it runs on, a truly random 50/50 split, is exactly what that study used. What the coin (or the button) is really doing is not choosing for you. It is giving you a concrete outcome to react to, and your reaction is the real answer.

The Psychology of Random Decisions

Here is the interesting part: when you get a result you do not like, you immediately know what you actually wanted. The button acts as a mirror for your true preferences rather than an oracle for the future.

Say you ask “Should I quit my job?” and the button says “Yes.” Pay attention to your gut reaction in that first second. If you feel a flash of relief, that tells you something real. If you feel a spike of anxiety, maybe you are not actually ready, or maybe there is a specific fear worth naming before you decide anything. The random result does not know your situation. Your emotional response to it does.

A Worked Example

Imagine you have narrowed a restaurant choice down to two options and have been going back and forth in the group chat for ten minutes. Assign one option to Yes and the other to No, press the button, and notice what you feel when the answer appears. If your stomach sinks a little at “Thai food,” you already know you wanted pizza. The button did not make the decision. It just gave your preference somewhere to show up. The same trick works for smaller stakes decisions all day long: which task to start with, whether to take the call now or in ten minutes, whether to go for the run or skip it today.

When to Use the Button

The Yes No Button works best for:

  1. Low-stakes decisions: what to eat, what to watch, where to go
  2. Truly balanced options: when both choices are genuinely close, so the outcome will not sting either way
  3. Breaking loops: when you have been going back and forth on the same two options for longer than the decision deserves
  4. Creative blocks: when you need a random prompt to get unstuck and start moving

When Not to Use the Button

Some decisions deserve real deliberation, not a random split:

  • Major financial investments
  • Health and safety choices
  • Decisions that significantly affect other people
  • Anything irreversible with serious consequences

For decisions like these, a random result can still be useful as a diagnostic, the way it was in Levitt’s study, but it should never be the final word. Talk to the people affected, get expert advice where it matters, and treat the button’s answer as a prompt to notice your own reaction rather than an instruction to follow.

The 5-Second Rule

Try this technique: set a 5-second timer before you press the button. If you have not decided by the time it goes off, press it. This keeps you from spiraling into endless back-and-forth while still giving your brain a fair shot at a quick, intuitive choice first. Often you will find yourself deciding within those five seconds anyway, and the button becomes unnecessary. That is the goal, not a failure of the method.

Using History as a Journal

The Yes No Button keeps a running log of your last several results in your browser. Over time, that history can reveal a pattern worth noticing: are you asking the same question over and over, in slightly different words? Repeatedly returning to the same yes-or-no question is often a better signal than any single answer. It usually means you already know what you want to do and are looking for permission, not information.

Quick Answers

How do I make decisions faster? Set a hard deadline before you start weighing options, even an arbitrary one like the 5-second rule above. Most delay comes from re-litigating the same two or three points over and over, not from missing information. A deadline forces you to act on what you already know.

What if I’m still confused after the button gives an answer? That’s a signal, not a failure. Confusion after a random result usually means the two options weren’t actually as close as you thought, or that a factor you haven’t named out loud is doing the real work. Sit with the confusion for a minute and ask what it is you’re actually unsure about, rather than pressing the button again for a different result.

Conclusion

The Yes No Button is not about outsourcing your decisions to a random number generator. It is a small tool for cutting through indecision on the choices that do not deserve more of your attention than they are getting, and for surfacing what you already feel about the ones that do. The next time you are stuck between two good options, give it a try. You might learn something about what you actually wanted.